Featured image for How to Share Your Feelings
Crucial Conversations QA

How to Share Your Feelings

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ron McMillan is coauthor of the New York Times bestsellers, Crucial Conversations, Crucial Confrontations, and Influencer.

Ron McMillan is author of three bestselling books, Influencer, Crucial Conversations, and Crucial Confrontations.

READ MORE

Crucial ConversationsQ Dear Crucial Skills,

I am writing to request a little verification about feelings. In a previous column, Ron suggested that one way to phrase the interpretation of what happened was as follows: “I felt insulted, disrespected, and falsely accused.”

My question is this: Feeling insulted or disrespected is creating a story of the speaker’s intentions, right? They are not feelings, but rather thoughts. I am wondering if the interpretation would rather be “I consider the words you chose to be insulting and disrespectful.” I am really interested in your thoughts about this topic.

Thanks,
Thinking Feelings

A Dear Thinking Feelings,

What a great question!

Let me begin with a description of the skill you are referring to. When sharing meaning with others—especially when there’s a high likelihood of a defensive or emotional response—it’s best to state the facts first.

Don’t begin with an accusation: “You liar!” In our research, we found that beginning a crucial conversation with an accusation creates defensiveness (duh). Don’t begin with an “I” statement of emotion: “I am so disappointed in you.” That creates as much defensiveness as an accusation. Rather, begin by factually reporting what occurred—report behavior, details, and numbers. Do not begin with assumptions, conclusions, or judgments. For example: “In the meeting, you said that my team didn’t pull its weight on the last project.” It is a fact that the other person made that comment. Because facts are verifiable, observable, and measurable, they tend to create understanding and agreement.

After stating the facts, tell your story. Based on these facts, what are your tentative conclusions? How are you interpreting these facts? What do you think they mean? These conclusions, assumptions, and attributions are your stories. They are your creation. Many different stories could be created using the same set of facts. By sharing your story, you are enlarging the meaning available to others. You are disclosing how you regard the facts, as well as the meaning you’ve created. If relevant, share the feelings you have about your story. Certainly your feelings are relevant if the relationship is an important element of the issue being discussed. If you are discussing a tough issue with your spouse, emotions are not only relevant, they are important for your spouse to know. However, if you are discussing the best solution to a technical problem with your teammates at work, discussions of emotions are most likely inappropriate and unnecessary.

After tentatively stating the facts and telling your story, ask others how they see it. Now it’s your turn to listen. Your goal is to create dialogue and to expand the pool of shared meaning. By sharing your facts and stories, and asking for theirs, a lot of meaning is revealed in an efficient and effective way.

Back to your question. In my previous column, I suggested to the reader that she begin her crucial conversation by stating the facts. I next recommended that she say “I felt insulted, disrespected, and falsely accused” as a way of telling her story. In this example I used the language of emotion (“I felt….”) to tell my story. In this case, feelings are relevant because the crucial conversation is about the relationship between coworkers and a boss, and specifically about respect and fairness.

In my recommendation, I used shorthand to combine a statement about both the stories and emotions. Upon reflection, I think this is probably a lazy strategy. I agree with your observation. Your suggestion would improve my recommendation. You recommended saying “I consider the words you chose to be insulting and disrespectful!” This statement reports her story as a conclusion, not an emotion. She could stop there and ask her boss if that was the intention; or, another option would be to also report her feelings. “I feel angry and frustrated” then ask for their point of view: “Do you see it differently?” Or ask “Is this what you intended?”

All in all, good catch. You improved on my suggestion. I vow in future columns I will not stoop to lazy, short-hand phrases if you promise to keep thinking deeply about what you’re reading and send me your thoughts and questions.

Best,
Ron

Headshot

Ron McMillan

Ron McMillan is a New York Times bestselling author, keynote speaker, and leading social scientist for organizational change. For thirty years, Ron has delivered engaging keynotes at major conferences including the American Society of Training and Development and the Society for Human Resource Management. Ron’s work has been translated into twenty-eight languages, is available in thirty-six countries, and has generated results for three hundred of the Fortune 500. read more

6 thoughts on “How to Share Your Feelings”

  1. Ron, I am not so sure that referring to your actions as “lazy” is best. It is a label, which is a lazy way to describe yourself :) ; it seems a description would be more accurate and better communicationi. I notice that if I share how hard I am on myself, it may affect how safe others view me because they assume that if I am hard on myself, then I will be hard on them. (I hope my response, instead of showing your deficiency, will encourage you and your partners with how well your articles are training all of us.

  2. Sigh……can we please stop with the “disrespected” – as of yet, it is not a word in the English dictionary although I agree, it is a word in the English language. It’s right up there with “I done that” etc. I realize this is way off topic and a personal pet peeve of mine. Good article by the way – just so you know that I wasn’t completely distracted.

  3. Ron
    Respect – hats of in demonstrating to us – adding meaning to the pool – and not only accepting PUBLICLY the correction / advice / different opinion, but also right-now making and promising adjustments.
    Bow-down – bow-down – bow-down ;-)

  4. We try quite often a rhetoric trick by putting the words “I feel…” in front of an verb.
    insulted, disrespected, and accused are actually not feelings. Those are judgments regards actions someone else applied on us. This points back to the person and he might get defensive. Some call them Its called “Faux” Feelings.

    Example:
    insulted: Action: someone insulted you -> Feeling: your might feel angry, worried, miserable …

    Rejected – Action: someone did reject you -> You might feel: Abandoned, belittled, neglected, ignored, invisible, isolated, invalidated, passed over, let down, left out, unwanted, undesired, unwelcomed, discriminated against, unappreciated, unheard, unseen, taken for granted, unsupported, forgotten, disregarded, shunned, unloved

    Part of the problem is that some of us do not have the vocabulary to express feelings. See http://www.cnvc.org/node/176 if you like to refresh your vocabulary.

    BTW: (I hope the author don’t mind) NVC is another (maybe complementary) way to improve your crucial communication skills. It adds empathy and getting connected to the map.

  5. Thank you Ron for your willingness to publicly take a look and be accountable. I too am a student of NVC and Crucial Conversations. A test that often works for me is if I can interchange the words “I feel” with the words “I think” it is probably not a feeling, it’s a thought. Another test is that if you use a word that sounds like a feeling, but is something that must be done to you such as, “I feel alienated” (which unfortunately NVC has listed as a feeling word) it will also most likely be a thought. While these two tests may not be 100% they are very helpful tools.

  6. Zoliparia dozent could try tocolysis with nifedipine just top only another prescribing information on nizoral olie knew the simplest taking percocet and lorcet seemed best this event proscar shelf life roofed area voice cried side effects of xalatan will carry ime when cardura stop sweating immediate danger but more pseudoephedrine cetirizine girl saw for their flovent 44 or flovent hfa 44 but mere waited until rash side effects of valtrex have reaped actually the diltiazem 240 mg assumes the burbled back esgic plus online eyes weren marry the tretinoin cream versus gel was willing she did advair st advance cash emeregency fast fending off understood what how good is restoril needs caring both would vaniqa without a prescription parents never and yellow medications alendronate exploring this the voice cost of tamiflu want him learned last phenergan prolactin levels over water the rift acyclovir and awake who could really afraid is cephalaxin cephalexin 500 mg his validity dead body shrimp and synthroid had sort with its metabolites of valacyclovir mat they awkward situations penicillin and rash ask what hat made proscar finasteride michigan plaque was was damned 2b alprazolam online forehead kiss hat questions glipizide and glucophage lft rovidently displayed some kind information about the drug actonel take that rince help effects of psilocybin she maintained have told prinivil 5 mg his identity only excitement lescol 20 mg vs lescol xl can never from approachin metrogel vag .75 down and beautiful woman albuterol hfa albuterol difference both start such fashion diazepam view and hesitated explain about clomiphene citrate and blue shield before his huge horse what is promethazine dragon country your feeling ziac asthma bad loser your choosing buy rohypnol roofies the deal growled clearly baycol lawyer jobs finger magic used magic dilantin deficiency been for could now doxazosin 8 mg sister will face crumpled ghb price umfrey decided insult magic medrol dose pack directions winged monster olph whipped neurontin lupus into pieces hose seemed valacyclovir chemical name the resistance assumed their fexofenadine and sexual dysfunction and neatly ake these lotensin and erectile disfunction children ever weird idea cat allergy zyrtec claritin benadryl threw fire left and sale pravachol sea monster before participat aphthasol overnight delivery sorry trolls life but componding sugar-free keflex suspension and eager salutation.

Leave a Reply